News, updates, resources, stories, and help from an Ohio attorney through a Blog.
Numerous factors indicating impairment give trooper reasonable suspicion to prolong traffic stop even though he only detected a "small" odor of alcohol.
Read MoreSigns of drinking are insufficient to justify an arrest for an OVI (operating a vehicle while impaired) at a sobriety checkpoint, without also observing signs of impairment such as erratic driving or behavior.
Read More10th District focuses on positive clues for impairment to find probable cause, while ignoring all clues that show a lack of impairment.
Read MoreEvidence to arrest sole occupant of single vehicle accident is sufficient even when the occupant was not observed driving the vehicle.
Read MoreDriving slow when an officer pulls behind may be a reason to initiate a traffic stop.
Read MoreThe Fifth District Holds that, although bloodshot eyes and the odor of alcohol are not enough for reasonable suspicion to conduct field sobriety tests, if there is an admission to drinking there is probable cause to arrest regardless of field sobriety tests.
Read MoreFifth District substitutes its decision on a suppression motion for that of the trial court, reasoning that the trial court substituted its decision for the police officer, thus eliminating review of the the police officer's actions.
Read MoreThe 9th District concludes that the State had probable cause to arrest for a marijuana OVI, despite the defendant passing the field sobriety tests and the officer smelling only raw marijuana.
Read MoreThe 1st District relies on its legal theory of a "Shotgun Motion to Suppress," to reduce the state's burden to merely "general and slight" when showing substantial compliance with field sobriety tests.
Read MorePassing two field sobriety tests is not enough to stop an OVI arrest, when other factors are sufficient to establish probable cause.
Read MoreThe First District holds that a woman, placed in a police car, and denied use of her cellphone, is not under arrest until the police officer intends to put her under arrest.
Read MoreThe Sixth District holds that attacks to prior OVI convictions based on being uncounseled must be supported with some evidence, even if an affidavit, in the present case; and the Eleventh District holds that probable cause exists when a driver leaves the scene of an accident, gets his vehicle stuck in the mud, has beer cans in his truck, glassy, sleepy eyes, an odor of alcohol, seems confused, and refuses sobriety tests.
Read MoreIn three recent appellate court decisions, The 9th District rejected an ineffective assistance claim because it relied on evidence outside the record, the 11th District affirmed a motion to suppress when a trooper pulled over a car for a license plate light but failed to check it during the traffic stop, and the 10th District rejected a speedy trial appeal due to tolling and addressed attempts to introduce testimony about the statistical probability of BAC levels with field sobriety tests, without providing an expert.
Read MoreExperienced attorney with 19 years of legal expertise in OVI/DUI defense, criminal defense, labor union law, and employment law. Admitted to practice in Ohio, the U.S. District Courts for Northern and Southern Ohio, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.
by Brian J. Smith, Esq
The Law Offices of Brian J. Smith, ltd.
20545 Center Ridge Road, Suite 215, Rocky River, Ohio 44116
800-641-1970
https://www.BrianSmithLaw.com
Criminal Defense - DUI Defense - Unemployment Appeals - Union Labor Law
Unemployment Appeals and Union Labor Law service areas include the State of Ohio.
Criminal and OVI services areas include: Cuyahoga, Erie, Huron, Ottawa, Lorain, Lake, Medina, Sandusky and Geauga Counties
Disclaimer / Privacy Policy
© Brian J. Smith, all rights reserved.
