Ohio Supreme Court Says Expert Testimony Not Needed to Show Prescription Caused Impairment for OVI's

Ohio Supreme Court Says Expert Testimony Not Needed to Show Prescription Caused Impairment for OVI's

Ohio Supreme Court holds that, "When the effects of a drug are sufficiently well known . . . expert testimony linking ingestion of the drug with indicia of impairment is unnecessary to convict of an OVI.

Read More

State Must Show Nexus Between Prescription and Impairment - DUI News - 06/02/16

State Must Show Nexus Between Prescription and Impairment - DUI News - 06/02/16

Fourth District confirms that, for an OVI based on a prescription medication, the State must show a nexus between the prescription and impairment through "(1) the testimony of an expert who is familiar with the potential side effects of the medication" or (2) the testimony of a layperson (such as a friend or family member) who witnesses the effect of the particular drug on the defendant-driver."

Read More

Unemployment Appeals Reports 3/12/16

Unemployment Appeals Reports 3/12/16

The Second District holds that an employer lacks just cause to terminate an employee for refusing to stop taking prescription morphine, even if he does not ask the doctor for alternative treatments.  Additionally, an employer may not justify reasons for a termination other than those actually used.

Read More

DUI Appeals Reports 12/7/2015

DUI Appeals Reports 12/7/2015

The Fourth District upholds the dismissal of OVI charges against a person who admitted to taking prescription medications, because the State did not "present some evidence of how the particular medication actually affects the defendant or that the particular medication has the potential to impair a person's judgment or reflexes."

Read More