Trial Court Can Infer Operating a Vehicle for an OVI Conviction - DUI News - 06/03/2016
/Fifth District affirms an OVI conviction without any witness to the defendant operating the vehicle.
Read MoreNews, updates, resources, stories, and help from an Ohio attorney through a Blog.
Fifth District affirms an OVI conviction without any witness to the defendant operating the vehicle.
Read MoreFourth District confirms that, for an OVI based on a prescription medication, the State must show a nexus between the prescription and impairment through "(1) the testimony of an expert who is familiar with the potential side effects of the medication" or (2) the testimony of a layperson (such as a friend or family member) who witnesses the effect of the particular drug on the defendant-driver."
Read MorePassing two field sobriety tests is not enough to stop an OVI arrest, when other factors are sufficient to establish probable cause.
Read MoreEleventh District rejects trial court's attempt to manipulate sentencing on remand.
Read MoreThird District holds that anonymous tips given to a McDonald's worker who then calls the police should not be analyzed as anonymous tips.
Read MoreThe Sixth District holds that when hospitals conduct blood-alcohol tests at the request of the police, and the tests are not performed for medical purposes, warrant protections still apply even when the police requested the results pursuant to R.C. 2317.022.
Read MoreThe Fifth District held that an officer's mistaken belief that stopping prior to a stop sign was a violation was an objectively reasonable belief, and therefore the resulting traffic stop was based on sufficient reasonable suspicion.
Read MoreThe Fifth District holds that the strong odor of cologne put on when leaving a bar is a factor in determining reasonable suspicion and probable cause.
Read MoreTraffic stop of motorcycles for failure to give turn signals OK, even if officers cannot see whether hand signals were given? Fifth District says yes, at least when the defendant reports the hand signals were given by a passenger.
Read MoreOhio Supreme Court affirms the OVI Habitual Offender Specification found in the R.C. 2941.1413.
http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2016/2016-Ohio-1092.pdf
March 22, 2016
Klembus was sentenced to one year for a Fourth Degree Felony OVI and one year for the repeat-OVI specification, to be served consecutively. He appealed, and the Eighth District agreed, holding that the repeat OVI offender specification violated equal protection because OVI penalty and the specification require identical proof yet impose different penalties. Subsequently, the First, Second, Third, Eleventh, and Twelfth Districts rejected the Eighth District opinion.
The Ohio Supreme Court reversed the Eighth District, and in upholding the specification reasoned, "The possibility of longer prison sentences for those who continue to violate Ohio's OVI statute is rationally related to the state's legitimate interest in punishing offenders and protecting the public from the dangers of impaired driving."
If you are interested in criminal defense services, or have been charged with an OVI, consider reviewing our DUI Defense Services at http://SivinskiLegal.com
Third District holds that an individual receiving treatment after an auto accident can refuse a blood alcohol test by the police, but the health care provider's own blood test used for treatment will still be admissible even if it does not substantially comply with ODH regulations like the police test would have to.
Read MoreThe First District holds that a woman, placed in a police car, and denied use of her cellphone, is not under arrest until the police officer intends to put her under arrest.
Read MoreThe 9th District finds a tow truck driver to be a known citizen informant whose tip is sufficiently reliable to justify a traffic stop.
Read MoreThe Twelfth District holds that collateral attacks of prior convictions during felony OVI cases are limited to violations of the right to counsel.
Read MoreI am an attorney with Sivinski Law Offices, providing legal representation for labor and employment issues, criminal defense, DUI defense, and family law. I am admitted to practice in the State of Ohio, the United States District Court for the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
I am also a father ofthree lively children, a member of St. Peter's Catholic church in Huron, and we enjoy all opportunities to get outdoors to cycle, hike, fish, play catch with our redbone coonhound Duke, barbecue, and to explore my enjoyment of photography.
by Brian J. Smith, Esq
The Law Offices of Brian J. Smith, ltd.
20545 Center Ridge Road, Suite 215, Rocky River, Ohio 44116
800-641-1970
https://www.BrianSmithLaw.com
Criminal Defense - DUI Defense - Unemployment Appeals - Union Labor Law
Unemployment Appeals and Union Labor Law service areas include the State of Ohio.
Criminal and OVI services areas include: Cuyahoga, Erie, Huron, Ottawa, Lorain, Lake, Medina, Sandusky and Geauga Counties
Disclaimer / Privacy Policy
© Brian J. Smith, all rights reserved.